Macbeth English CW Essay Example for Free

Macbeth English CW Essay Malcolm calls Macbeth and Lady Macbeth this dead butcher and his fiend like queen, (Act 5, Scene 9, Line 36). Do you think that Lady Macbeth has any redeeming qualities? In this essay I will try to show that Lady Macbeth, although she is evil, does have some redeeming qualities. I think that Lady Macbeth does have redeeming qualities and that she shows these at different points throughout the play. I think that we can see Lady Macbeth as a different person because we see what happens at points when Malcolm doesnt. We know that Lady Macbeth was not responsible for the killing of Banquo and The thane of Fifes wife and children. However, there is ambiguity over the question of whether Lady Macbeth is a witch or not. In these times a witch could have been identified by her ability to predict the future, fly, sail in sieves, bring on night in daytime and their damned spot. This is a supposed red mark on a witchs body from where the devil has supposedly sucked blood. In act 1, scene 5 she says: Come, you spirits That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here And fill me from the crown to the toe topfull Of direst cruelty This suggests that she wants evil spirits to take over to allow her to do what needs to happen. This makes us think that she may be a witch. In Elizabethan times people were quite scared of witches and King James, the king at the time, was especially fascinated by witches. In act 1, scene 5 Lady Macbeth seems very pleased to receive Macbeths letter but we see her say that she doesnt think that Macbeth will be brave enough to murder Duncan for the crown. We also see that she is ambitious and ruthless when she says: And chastise with the valour of my tongue All that impedes thee from the golden round, But she appears to be ambitious for her husband and not for herself. I think that this is a redeeming quality as she just wants to help her husband, as she doesnt think he will go through with it because he is not tough enough. This seems fiend like as to suggest to kill a king is awful, made even worse by the fact that he will be sleeping and unarmed. A soldier would only consider killing and armed man, in battle morally right but to kill a guest is morally wrong. This is also regicide, and Shakespeare was taking a big risk putting such a controversial thing into one of his plays. I think that Lady Macbeth might horrify the audience with her language here especially when she says: Which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem To have thee crowned withal. I think that the audience would have been particularly shocked with the words metaphysical aid as these are supernatural forces. I think that the audience would have been shocked further when Lady Macbeth says: Come, you spirits That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here And fill me from the crown to the toe topfull Of direst cruelty Here Lady Macbeth calls to the evil spirits and asks them to full her with cruelty. This would have suggested that she either was a witch or wanted to become a witch. For the audience at this time this would have been horrifying. The words that Shakespeare uses suggest that Lady Macbeths head is full of thoughts of becoming queen, especially when she says, crown. Also the alliteration in the phrase, to the toe topfull, stresses the t sounds and stresses the syllables of topfull. Then Shakespeare uses soft s sounds, which sound like hissing, suggest Lady Macbeths association with evil. The association with evil comes from the story of Adam and Eve. In the Bible Adam and Eve are tempted by a snake to take an apple from the tree. This snake was in fact the devil and this therefore associates a snake (or hissing sounds) with the devil and evil. I dont think that Macbeths and Lady Macbeths relationship is conventional for the time as she seems to have a more male role. She seems stronger than Macbeth and in a way seems to have a power over him. She hasnt even spoken to him yet and she has already decided what the plan of action is going to be in order for him to become king. In Act 1, Scene 6, we see Lady Macbeth welcoming Duncan to her house. In this scene she plays the role of the hostess and seems to be extremely evil in this scene. We have just seen her telling Macbeth about the plan to kill Duncan and now she is being really nice to Duncan. This will cause the audience to dislike her as we can see that she is obviously not a very nice person. This shows her as being really two faced and insincere towards Duncan. She is being, as she tells Macbeth to be later on, the innocent flower but the serpent underneath. In Act 1, Scene 7, we see Macbeth talking to himself and saying that he has no motives or good reasons to kill Duncan. But then Lady Macbeth comes in and uses blackmail and she taunts him to get him to go through with this, and to get her own way. When you durst do it, then you were a man. And to be more than what you were, you would Be so much more the man. This suggest that Lady Macbeth thinks that Macbeth is a coward and therefore not a man. This is fiend like as she is blackmailing Macbeth into doing it. She is telling him he is not a man, and to be unmanned was a bad thing in Elizabethan times. Lady Macbeth, therefore, looks like she is very responsible for Duncans death as it wouldnt have even happened if Lady Macbeth hadnt persuaded Macbeth to do it. In this scene Macbeth appears to be weak and not the dominant person in this relationship. Also she doesnt appear to show any recognition that what she is doing is so wrong. I think that Lady Macbeth would shock the audience when she says that she would rather kill her own child than break such a promise as this one. I have given suck and know How tender tis to love the babe that milks me: I would, while it was smiling in my face, Have plucked my nipple from his boneless gums And dashed the brains out, had I so sworn This also shoes Lady Macbeths fiend like qualities. This statement would have shocked the audience greatly. She says that she would kill her own baby while it was smiling at her while she was breast feeding it if she had sworn to do so. This is a shocking statement and I think it would have shocked anyone. This truly shows how evil she is. This statement also raises another point of ambiguity. Lady Macbeth says, I have given suck This suggests that she has had a baby but there appears to be no child now. This raises the question of where the child is or if it is even alive. In Act 2, Scene 2 Lady Macbeth appears to have a few redeeming qualities. The fact that she has had to have a drink because she isnt feeling brave is a redeeming quality. Also the fact that her thought are flicking around shows her tension and suggests that she is not as impenetrably ruthless as she seems. He is about it. The doors are open, and the surfeited grooms Do mock their charge with snores. This is another redeeming quality as it may shows her feeling guilty. Also when she says: Had he not resembled My father as he slept, I had donet. This shows that she does have compassion as she couldnt kill someone who looked like her father. Also in this scene when Macbeth comes back from killing Duncan, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth have a frantic, disjointed conversation while Macbeth is holding the daggers. This conversation last for thirty seven lines and it is only on the last line that Lady Macbeth realises that Macbeth is still holding the daggers. This shows how panic stricken they are and how neither is thinking clearly. This is a redeeming quality as this suggests that Lady Macbeth feels guilty and worried. In Act 2, Scene 3, Lady Macbeth faints when she hears that Duncan has been murdered. This is ambiguous as we dont know if she is actually fainting or whether she is trying to cover up the situation. However this point is ambiguous as there are a number of reasons for why she might have fainted. She could be surprised (or even dismayed) that Macbeth is acting on his own or she might be shocked at Macbeths rashness when he kills the guards. Another point is that she might genuinely be upset at Macbeths gory description, as she said that Duncan reminded her of her father. The story which is probably more likely is that she is trying to draw attention away from the fact that Macbeth killed the guards to stop him from looking so guilty. This shows how evil she is. She doesnt want people to focus on it too much and she also doesnt want to be blamed. In Act 3, Scene 2, we see that Macbeth and Lady Macbeth have drifted apart ad become more distant. Macbeth has become more independent as well. We see this when we see that Macbeth has made plans to kill Banquo, but Lady Macbeth is not involved. This is a redeeming quality as we see that Lady Macbeth has nothing to do with this murder, only they murder of Duncan which was to help her husband anyway. She seems to be affected by this as she asks him what will happen, Whats to be done?, but Macbeth wont tell her. In Act 3, Scene 4, we see the banquet held by Macbeth. Lady Macbeth seems to be different at the start of this scene as Macbeth says, our hostess keeps her state. These suggest that Lady Macbeth is sitting quietly, away from everyone else. This shows that she is not acting like the conventional hostess. This also ambiguous and suggests that Lady Macbeth may have begun to lose her mind already or she may be feeling isolated as she and Macbeth have drift apart. This could also shows that she is feeling guilty which is a redeeming quality. However, as soon as Macbeth leaves the feast Lady Macbeth goes after him to remind him that he mustnt leave and that he needs to go and be the host. When Macbeth starts to see Banquo and behave weirdly, Lady Macbeth covers up for him but tells him to stop being stupid and entertain the guests. You have displaced the mirth, broke the good meeting With most admired disorder. Here she is scorning Macbeth for ruining the banquet and drawing attention to himself. Lady Macbeth does not seem to feel guilty in this scene but she does seem afraid. I dont think that she shows signs of feeling in this scene as she still blackmails and taunts Macbeth to get him to sit down and act as though everything is normal. Act 5, Scene 1 is the last scene that we see with Lady Macbeth in it. I think that Shakespeare uses the sleepwalking in this scene so that all can be revealed by Lady Macbeth to another character. I think that in this scene we begin to feel sorry for Lady Macbeth and I think that she has some redeeming qualities in this scene. One is that she acknowledges that she has done something wrong. What will these hands neer be clean? This shows that she thinks she has blood on her hands and she wants then to be clean. She obviously feels guilty as she is having nightmares about it all. Also in this scene Lady Macbeth begins to speak in prose. Shakespeare always makes his main characters speak in verse but Lady Macbeth no longer speaks in verse. This shows that she is mad and is no longer important to the play. Also I think another redeeming quality is that she seems to feel responsible for all the deaths throughout the play, even tough she was only really responsible for one of the deaths, Duncans. I think that in this scene we begin to feel sorry for Lady Macbeth and like her a bit more. This scene shows that she does have redeeming qualities and that she isnt completely evil. I dont think that lady Macbeth is a fiend like queen. I think she is evil but has many redeeming qualities which make her seem a lot better as you go through the play. I also think that the fact that we see more of Lady Macbeth than Malcolm does mean we have the opportunity to see these redeeming qualities whereas Malcolm might not. I think that the moral of this play is dont kill the king. It is not honourable or good and it will come back to haunt you.

Theodore Roethkes Root Cellar Essay -- Root Cellar Theodore Roethke E

Theodore Roethke's "Root Cellar"   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Theodore Roethke was raised in Michigan, where cities and towns are woven with lakes, streams, and rivers. This atmosphere gave Roethke a â€Å"mystical reverence for nature,† (McMichael, 1615) and allowed him to take a grotesque image and transform it into natural magnificence. A great example of this is Roethke’s poem â€Å"Root Cellar.† The poem describes a cellar, which most people would consider to be a death-baring, cold place. Instead, Roethke gives the dungeon life and enchantment. The first line gives the reader an idea that the cellar is awake. In the second line, there is a description of the plants left in numerous boxes that search for a bit of light to help them continue their existence. The plants’ roots hanging from the crates that are packed into the small space are portrayed in the third, fourth and fifth lines. The odor of the cellar is acknowledged in the sixth line. The seventh line describes the aging of the roots. The eighth line describes the stems of the plants and gives them more dimensions. The ninth line depicts the floor’s slipperiness. The tenth and eleventh lines describe how everything in the cellar was trying to hold on to their life for as long as possible. Roethke’s ability of creating imagery in this poem lets the reader visualize every aspect of the cellar.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Roethke uses a few different literary modes to help create his imagery. Metaphor and similes are figures of speech in which a word or phrase tha...

Managing Team Conflict

Potential sources of conflict for the team include team member’s schedules, member disagreement, lack of consideration of deadlines, lack of input, and ineffective communication. One issue to contribute to conflict is the lack of input of all team members and the failure for team members to show up and meet at the designated time agreed upon by all team members.   Since there are different knowledge and skill set levels of all the members of the team, there can be areas where these levels overlap. In addition, there can also be areas where the team is missing necessary strengths to fully assist the team in its goals.Without effective communication, team members cannot fully express skills each person currently possesses, and areas of knowledge where assistance is needed.   Communication barriers pose potential problems as well. One communication barrier that exists is failure for group members to utilize active listening. According to Hamilton (2001), â€Å"Many times whe n we are discussing a problem with others, we listen selfishly. In other words, we listen to gather ammunition for our rebuttals and to determine when we an insert our viewpoints into our conversation. Active listening requires us to listen from the speaker’s viewpoint† (312). With this in mind, it is important for all team members to utilize active listening and be open to new ideas and thinking. It is through learning from other team members that a team can increase strengths and gain additional knowledge to assist the team in its goals.One way to assist with communication is having a leader of the team. The role of the leader is essential because it helps the team maintain organization and structure. Having a leader can assist the team when decision making must be performed. In the decision making process, three leadership styles used are autocratic, democratic and laissez-fairre. Each of these leadership styles can be used by any individual within the team. Ultimate ly, the goal of the team should be to use the democratic leadership style. The democratic leadership style is the preferred method of decision making because, â€Å"two-way communication exists between leaders and followers,† (Hamilton, 319). It is this two-way communication that will assist all team members in having a say about the decision and making the decision that will best benefit all team members.Failure to utilize effective communication can lead to conflict within the group. One conflict already experienced within the group is lack of input and failure for all members to show up for designated meetings. This creates a problem since all input is needed to make effective decisions within the group. It becomes a problem for completing assignments without all input from team members and creates tension within the team since less members are available to perform all the work needed to complete the assignment. Those members who are actively working on the assignments are doing work for those members who fail to give input or report as a team.One source of conflict that is beneficial to the team is that conflict surrounding differences of opinions. Since each individual is unique and brings knowledge with him or her, having challenging opinions and views will ultimately assist the team in its knowledge and long term goals. 2. How will the team deal with a team member who will not cooperate with the team goals and objectives – for instance, the team member who is personally offensive; or, the team member who is a social loafer?Having a leader who will be in charge of the team is a way to limit the issues that arise in the team. In addition, ground rules must be established when the team is formed to minimize the risk of issues among the team. If a team member is consistently disrupting the team and not assisting the team in its goals, then action needs to be taken. If the leader of the team is unable to resolve the issue with the team member, then additional intervention may need to occur.3. Reflect once more on the experiences you’ve had within your current learning team. Describe a time when the members of your team have managed conflict by: a. Avoidance b. Competition c. Accommodation d. Collaboration e. Compromise Next, discuss which of the above conflict management methods seemed to yield the best outcomes for your learning team. Explain your rationale. Since lack of input poses to be a problem with the current learning team, avoidance is used by team members. The remaining team members who show up for meetings and actively contribute have done so in a collaborative manner in order to finish the task at hand. The six conflict management strategies can occur in all teams, but the conflict management strategy that yields the best outcome is using collaboration. Collaboration is a means of problem solving that takes all ideas and finds the best solution based upon the ideas. If all team members bring ideas to the table, the learning team can then take all ideas into consideration and determine the best solution to the conflict.4. Summarize the responses to #3 into five specific team rules about conflict management that describe how team members will respond and behave in challenging situations. Consider adopting the following phrasing: When faced with conflict, our team will manage it by†¦. A. Create a schedule that lists who is responsible for what portion and the due date for inclusion in the overall project.B. Everyone will communicate in a respectful manner.C. Take constructive criticism and compromiseD. Work cooperatively with other members of the team.E.   Participate and complete assignment on timeReferencesHamilton, Cheryl R (2001) Communicating for Results. Belmont: Wadsworth / ThomsonLearning.

The rise and fall of long-term capital management - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1943 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Management Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? Introduction Roger Lowenstein write the book â€Å"When Genius Failed† about the risk management of funds which collapsed the worlds financial market system along with his founders and PhD genius intelligence. Summary of the content The story of long-term business of bond trade started in 1979 when well-known trader at Solomons brothers whose name was Meriwether introduced it. The young and talented Meriwether after his graduation from the University of Chicago joins Solomons in 1970, s. In 1970,s, the bond market was more active as compared to 1960,s and more people were interested in bond trades, which made them to earn high returns. In addition, one of the main reasons behind the active bond market was the invention of new computers, which had over taken the classic image of trader who shouts for selling and buying the orders at the trading floor, the computer network help and made their accesses to all buying and selling price very easy and effective. The formation of arbitrage group in 1977 was the one main reason of Solomons evolution. Meriwether was making high profits from the bond trades because his trade had high risk taking abilities, which increased its value in long-term business. Due to Meriwethe r, the banks were ready to give him financing for long term at suitable terms because he was the famous figure at that time among bankers. Meriwether was consider the only known public figure behind the long term capital management but the heart of the funds were the PhD computer genius who were computers freaks to whom Meriwether hired. They developed the models, which could quantify the bonds and tell when the market would be efficient to invest. Meriwether was very happy with his people work and their models; he was confident that he hired smartest people and develop incredible close relationship with them to get most out of them but the 1987 crash in which Solomon had lost $120 million in one day which was great shock to every one and here the story of long term losses start. The Mozer scandal in which one member of arbitrage use unfair deals in getting unfair profits while ignoring the good will of Meriwether and its firm, and Meriwether failed to supervise the MOOZAR activi ties. After settling this scandal by court Solomons appointed Hilibrand and Rosenfiels as a heads of arbitrage and govt desk. At the same time J.M, introduces hedge funds as a business in 1990.Americans were very excited at hedge funds and this raises the stock prices in market, high return increases the investment activities in the bond market. And set the new records at that time. Many Americans became millionaire and were interested in re investing their money. Hedge funds were the private investment pools for rich and wealthy people. So it was easy for SEC to monitor. Due to high returns in 1990,s investors start considering the safest and less risky bond trades. Meriwether wanted to give bond trade a high relative value in market. Early in 1993, Merrill agreed to raise capital for long term on the request of Meriwether, soon at that time. J.Morgan, s old arbitrage group left the Solomon one by one. And J.M hired the Melton a good consultant to Solomons to justify his investo rs about the bond plan. He joined the long term with the intension of showing his theories and models that long term is not a capital but it is a finical intermediary which provide the liquidity to the market. At the end of 1993, Merrill made a partnership with foreign banks in long term because investors were not satisfied with J.M investment strategies. After its partnership Merrill start raising funds by feeder system which was a piece of paper or a earning statement issued by Solomons to spread the long term portfolio around the world with the help of good marketing strategies. Long term gained the unparallel access to international banks for their private funds. A long term with this raised the funds by net amount of $1.25 billion in 1994, which was a good start ever. Long-term trade was not easy trade and required the investment banks to lend money for longer period with safest terms. Due to attraction of long term, high profits investment banks itself involved in long term business and became the competitors of long term, so J.M revise its marketing strategies and made only specific deals with investment banks to get maximum return from the market than any one else could get. At that time on Wall Street, the long-term traders and operators were doing their best in earning high profits by their good collaborations and high skills and better knowledge of market and their models. As a result, their profits were much higher than their expectations. After bond market, crash in 1994 long term used the mortgage securities for the purpose of refinancing and generated capital of $ 2 billion. Long term also enters in Italian market for hedging the funds and they successfully capture the market and boost their returns. It was very important for investors to learn about the nature of long term because if they were making profits at one time they also could make looses at some other time. It was responsibility of traders to make their investors aware about the nature and trends of long term. It was difficult to quantify the risk of funds but history of funds helped to assess their bonds market risk. According to Black-Scholes formula, the nature of bond prices in the market was random and this could help the investors to understand the prices and sudden swing in the market. Different assumptions gave by traders to investors that how they could make their money more in efficient market. In addition, if market is efficient than there will be less volatility, less risk and investors could get benefits from that situation. In 1987, portfolio insurance was given to investors to minimize their looses.Many long term had low risk but none of them had no risk. The main problem with long term was its inherited uncertainty, nobody knew how the long term will react in future and stocks return was simply considered as random distributed that means that if long term was loosing money at one time their would be time that it could make profits as wel l and this all depend on market efficiency. In 1995, long term made profits of $ 1.66 billion and Italy contributed a lot in that profit. The derivative trade had the same risk of gaining and losing but the long term returns were high more than ones expectations and long term had high returns because it had high leverage power. As the financial risk involves in long-term trade so no body at that time could say that they will make this profits forever because the future was uncertain and every investors should kept them selves ready to face any kind of uncertainty in future. Long-term balance was 30% more than its capital and this mutual fund was the largest fund at that time on Wall Street. According to the J.M, the long term shows its result over the long periods and required not only the time but also the patience of investors for high returns. Due to the J.M, good strategies for long term it became the model of wisdom and caution in 1995. By the late 1990,s every investment bank involved in long term business due to its lure. Different stock traders developed partnership and formed the merger deals. Arbitrage business was making high returns in capital market. Long term business attracted the banks , individual investors towards itself who were making their money from millions to billions and finding them selves the smartest people because they were involve in the riskiest and highly lucrative trade of that time. Mertons and Scholes won the noble prizes for their economics models and formulas, which could quantify the market risk and help to gain high returns. They decide to join LTCM to earn money. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The rise and fall of long-term capital management" essay for you Create order The fall of long term The failure of long term was the volatility of banks which short the huge sum   of equity volatility. Equity volatility was considered the major trade of long term but its funds also destroyed. It was assumed that the equity volatility will remain consistent based on Scholes model but it did not happened in the case of equity volatility. Because of less liquidity the long term short and at this trouble situation there were no buyer who was willing to invest in long term. As storm hits the markets the swaps spread and long term losses its billion of amounts in Russia, Japan, Germany and USA. Meriwether wanted to raise the money but looses were high than leverages and bond market was simply vanished. After increasing risk of long term looses in various countries J.M asked his traders to keep close eye on every proceedings and required up to date reports on arbitrage, equities and swaps but there was fall in demand as no buyer was there and banks also strict their credit polici es towards long terms because of fear of looses. Due to continuous poor performance of bonds long term capital management had not enough cash for there payment to banks and declared as insolvent. At that time long term liquidate its trade and wanted to retain its existing investors and wanted to attract new ones but they were unable to raise money as no one was ready to finance long term because of high risk of loosing money in future. Analysis and evaluation of book The august was the worst month which destroyed the financial market of long term and was the month when there was no buyer, Mertons model was no more their, bond yield, swap spreads and equity all shrink and looses money and was the reason of close of bond market. The main reason of the tremendous looses of long term was the problem which was with the cash flow of long-term capital management after revealing this confidential information to investors they tried to get out of all this. It was suspected that if long term by any of its trade would not able to raise money than it could loose its repo line and would not survive in market.. The main flaws of long-term strategies were * Totally relying on the market models which were developed on the believe that the market fluctuation in past could help to determine the prices ,risks and returns of the securities in future without taking this concept under consideration that the future is highly uncertain no one can predict the future. Therefore, it was wrong to design the future models on past performances of the market. * Market are not always perfectly efficient, if securities are making money in good time there could be time when it face looses * There was no exit strategy for highly illiquid leverage trade of long-term capital management. * Shifting of long-term partners from bond market where they had skills, knowledge and experience, to equity market, which was new to them, was one reason of failure of long-term capital. Conclusion This story is about the failure of long-term capital management due to its care less and greedy traders. Moreover, the investors were not aware of the nature and strategies of long term and its total indebtedness. Banks gave funds to long term due to its brand name, which it had established with its famous partners. In conclusion and after combining all facts together this is a good professional and interesting book which tell us that for trade we need experience and trading is not about the risk management. It is also important to understand the dynamics of market.